Please correct me if I am wrong, but is this not a treasonous offense? Enemy forces were aided in their attack because not only did the administration refuse to provide the additional security repeatedly requested, nor did they leave the security at the same level. The administration removed security, leaving our personnel in the cross-hairs, knowing the enemy would take advantage of the obvious weakness. The administration was advised a week prior of 'chatter' that there would be Islamic action on the upcoming anniversary of September 11, 2001.
Not one person interviewed, or appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, has stated that the administration, and specifically POTUS, was not aware of the situation. Nor has anyone come forward with proof to the contrary.
It has become painfully obvious that what has occurred since September 11, 2012, is a cover-up; and, a very poor one, at that.
In response to Barack Hussein Obama's October 26th interview, and his statement to the reporter, "I can tell you, as I’ve said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” [emphasis added], Congressional House Armed Services Committee Chairman, Howard P. 'Buck' McKeon, wrote a letter to POTUS requesting information, as follows:
1) The person(s) names who were given the 'first directive' and if it was
communicated to the military and other agencies verbally or in writing.
2) Did POTUS specifically direct the military to 'move available assets into
Libya to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel in Benghazi' at any point on
9/11/12; and, if so, which assets?
3) Did POTUS provide authority (other than intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance - ISR - assets) for the military to take any and all actions
necessary to secure said personnel, including specific authority to enter
Libyan airspace on 9/11/12?
4) Did POTUS communicate with and/or receive any recommendations from
the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or any
Commanders of regional Combatant Commands regarding available
military support and orders POTUS had given regarding U.S. personnel in
Benghazi on September 11th?
Essentially, the Committee is demanding a description of the events that took place and people involved after POTUS was advised of the attack.
First, it was a video that caused a demonstration that got out of control (proven false). Then, the administration didn't know it was happening at the time (proven false). Then, the President claims he took action (testimony to the contrary).
The administration has a huge problem, as all liars do: proving the lie to be true in light of all the evidence to the contrary.
Do you think answers will be forthcoming before the election? Have they ever been promptly given by this administration? Never!
Time to call your Representatives again, people!