But as for me and my house ...
Excerpts from Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com Back in March of 2010, the Senate’s Committee on Environment and Public Works sent out an email stating Drudge’s website was “responsible for the many viruses popping up throughout the Senate,” according to a CNet report. The CNet article posted on March 9, 2010 reported that the malware allegedly distributed by the Drudge Report actually came from DoubleClick, a subsidiary of Google which develops and provides internet ad serving services. It serves customers like Microsoft, General Motors, Coca-Cola, Motorola, Apple Inc., Visa USA, Nike and dozen of others. The Senate’s Committee on Environment and Public Works issued an urgent email late Monday claiming the DRUDGE REPORT is ‘responsible for the many viruses popping up throughout the Senate.’ [untrue] On Monday DRUDGE served over 29 million pages with NOT ONE email complaint received about ‘pop ups’, or the site serving ‘viruses’. Now Google Chrome [erroneously] tags Infowars.com as a malware distributor. Google should take a look at its own track record before trying to frighten off visitors to Infowars.com and Drudge. In 2012, a Federal Communications Commission document disclosed that Google’s Street View – an effort to photograph streets around the world – deliberately collected massive amounts of Wi-Fi payload data and the information was illegally stored at an Oregon Storage facility. Google attempted to hide the theft from the public. The pilfered data includes telephone numbers, URLs, passwords, email, text messages, medical records, video and audio files, according to Wired. The government then said the transnational communications corporation would not be criminally charged with wiretapping, in essence giving Google free reign to engage in additional theft. Moreover, the government complied with a Google request to redact portions of the FCC document. Google shares a cozy relationship with the intelligence community. In 2011, Consumer Watchdog, an advocacy group, asked the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa, to investigate Google’s relationship with the NSA and other government agencies. “The group asked Issa to investigate contracts at several U.S. agencies for Google technology and services, the ‘secretive’ relationship between Google and the U.S. National Security Agency, and the company’s use of a U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration airfield in California,” writes Grant Gross for PCWorld. “Federal agencies have also taken ‘insufficient’ action in response to revelations last year that Google Street View cars were collecting data from open Wi-Fi connections they passed, Consumer Watchdog said in the letter.” In 2010, it was reported that Google and the CIA jointly backed a company engaged in real time surveillance of the web. The company, Recorded Future, “scours tens of thousands of websites, blogs and Twitter accounts to find the relationships between people, organizations, actions and incidents — both present and still-to-come,” writes Noah Shachtman. Conclusion (my own): Google is working with the federal government to effect the New World Order. Watch for the next step - control of the internet.
0 Comments
I have not disappeared - or gone on vacation (what's a vacation?).
There are many in the 'free media' reporting on current events and those who reliably report on the New World Order and how today's headlines reveal their plan. I have been working on a report concerning the Cabal behind this evil plan to enslave mankind. It is important that you understand who and what we are actually fighting against. Please stay tuned ... As the U.S. government works diligently to remove the Bill of Rights from the Constitution, its modus operandi is becoming blatantly obvious. To remove the Second Amendment, and a citizen's right to bear arms (any weapon an enemy may possess, especially the government), report more gun violence - 'mass' gun violence. Never report the facts: Justice Department reports gun violence as a whole in the United States is down by over 40% in the past 20 years. To ensure the Patriot Act and its resulting big government remains intact, permit a bombing in a venue where a drill is coincidentally being performed - including radio-wired men in Navy S.E.A.L.-type clothing. This will also allow the government to practice Martial Law without declaring it - violating the Fourth Amendment - while people submit and cheer. To infringe upon the Fourth Amendment further, the Cyber-Intelligence and Sharing Act (CISPA) has been proposed and passed by the House, despite its obvious violations of present law, including HIPAA. If my thesis is correct, and there is something amiss here, there must be at least one cyber-attack that coincidentally mirrors the issue at hand, to underscore the 'need' for CISPA. And, so it has occurred - as reported in the New York Post yesterday morning: "It took only about five minutes for the market to tank and rebound after a group hacked the Associated Press’ Twitter feed to put out bogus information — and now the feds are taking a longer look to find out who got rich during the chaos. "The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have each opened investigations into the hack that falsely reported “explosions in the White House and Barack Obama is injured” and briefly wiped away $136 billion in market value." An 'investigation' is underway. Really? Has the American public been stupefied by our tainted food and water (hormone, fluorine- and chlorine-tainnted water, GMO poisoned foods, etc.), via government deal-making and edict, to the point that we cannot even see the pattern here? Despite these efforts, more and more people are waking up! It's high time all Americans wake up and smell the sewerage coming from all departments in Washington via mass media. Yes, the most of the media is involved. Richard Serino, was Chief of the Boston EMS and Assistant Director of the Boston Department of Health when he prepared a report in 2008 entitled 'Marathon: A Tale of Two Cities and Running a Planned Mass Casualty Event. Did he really mean to say 'Event' and not 'Drill'? In October, 2009, Mr. Serino was appointed Deputy Administrator of - FEMA! Mr. Serino outlines 'Working with the Media' on page 11 of his report: "Their mission is to get a story. Building a longstanding relationship with journalists and reporters ensures they get the right story and that they serve as a resource when needed." [emphasis added] Reporters are supposed to find and report suspicious government actions not build a relationship with them! Page 9 of the report states, "Utilize special events and drills as opportunities to plan and train together so that you may institutionalize 'working together'." [emphasis not added] The 'right' story is what the Government wants you to know and probably not the real story that reporters are supposed to work toward by investigation. Thus, the mass media is lazy. They no longer work with integrity to get the scoop and expose wrong-doing, but are government lackeys, reporting 'a story'. They have a relationship with the government and this relationship jades their views at the very least! The 'right' story from Boston was they weren't performing a drill. Don't look at any other pictures except those provided by the government. [Their words, not mine.] In essence, ignore the man behind the curtain. The report can be viewed at www.integratedtrainingsummit.org together with the picture on page 11 showing two men on a motorcycle, placing a camera on the ground behind a marathon runner! The camera was not pointed at the runner. To make matters worse, Google reported on April 26, 2013, that the Government made a record number of requests (up 26%, or 24,179 pieces) in the second half of 2012 to remove political content. Requests were made to remove YouTube videos, delete blog posts, and remove Google search items, making finding them difficult. All part of citizen stupefying efforts by our Government. The Constitution and your rights are under attack by your own government! As Mayor Bloomberg alluded, the government wants you to believe this is for your own good. I don't think so! Do you? Can you see the pattern? Have you woken up yet; or, are you still cattle? Call your Congressman and tell them you won't stand for this! The controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) passed by the U.S. House by a vote of 288-127 (18 abstained), and headed to the Senate for a vote (possibly Friday, April 25th). Amendments were passed in secret. CISPA will allow private companies to share the personal data of every U.S. citizen and resident (sometimes, incorrect data, as I recently discovered and the company refused to correct it), with the U.S. government, its law enforcement agencies, intelligence services, and over 600 other agencies. Therefore, if you patronize Facebook, Twitter, Google, Verizon, et al, your personal information will be provided to the U.S. Government and law enforcement — for whatever purpose the agencies deem necessary, in violation of the Fourth Amendment contained in the Bill of Rights. CISPA's purpose is purportedly to prevent cyber-attacks or trace an attack back to its source. The explanation of CISPA's necessity is that cyber-attacks are weapons in the virtual battlefield and could lead to actual war. Seriously?!? CISPA also amends the National Security Act, allowing U.S. intelligence services to share classified information with anyone, even persons without a security clearance. An amendment to CISPA was proposed, allowing U.S. companies to retain their privacy policies, but was voted down. These promises made to you, including terms of service, will be unenforceable should the Senate ratify the Bill. Hope you kept a list of companies you do business with! According to Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO), these companies are "completely exonerated from any risk of liability." Just like Monsanto! Eat our poison - you can't sue us! The Bill of Rights, Fourth Amendment, of the U.S. Constitution, states: 'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.' 'Probable cause' requires providing evidence of probable criminal activity before the law enforcement agency is allowed to search a citizen's person, home, papers, and effects, specifying the area to be searched. The Fourth Amendment does not protect against private companies mining for information about you for their own gain. It protects you against the U.S. government unlawfully accessing your data without a search warrant. CISPA, however, will allow the government to acquire all your personal data without a warrant, without probable cause, without your knowledge, and for free. According to the privacy and civil liberties group, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), "As it stands, CISPA is dangerously vague, and should not allow for any expansion of government powers through a series of poorly worded definitions. If the drafters intend to give new powers to the government's already extensive capacity to examine your private information, they should propose clear and specific language so we can have a real debate." Once information is acquired by the U.S. government, CISPA supposedly only allows the Government to use the information as it pertains to 'cyber-security', rather than 'national security'. However, the poorly defined language in CISPA enables its misuse. As with Obamacare, once it is in effect, it will prove much more intrusive than those who voted in favor, misguidedly intend. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) calls CISPA 'fatally flawed' and 'extreme', stating, "The core problem is that CISPA allows too much sensitive information to be shared with too many people in the first place, including the National Security Agency." I looked at the main stream media (NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN) to see how this is being reported and the results are as follows: NBC: NOTHING! SomeCBS headlines:
A sample of ABC headlines:
CNN: (ONLY ONE!)
Has the United States Government conspired to undermine HIPAA and the Fourth Amendment? Yes! Common sense tells us that health records cannot provide the Government with anything akin to cybersecurity 'threat information'. This is a phishing expedition by the U.S. Government to gain access to your private, personal information. Not only does it violate the Fourth Amendment - it violates HIPAA - it violates U.S. citizens! Have they lost their minds?!? No - there's a purpose in the seeming madness. To enslave You! ----- I wrote my Senator - will YOU? ALL amendments in the Bill of Rights are important to American citizens, NOT just the Second Amendment! They are NOT to be infringed upon and they are not amendable! Yet, Congress continues to try to undo the Bill of Rights. Therefore, are we to assume a name change for the United States of America is coming soon? Is Congress going to give authority over to the United Nations, as well? The CISPA Bill passed by the House violates the Fourth Amendment and, if the Senate passes it, there will be lawsuits filed. If no one else does, I will! Congress: Stop trying to undo the Bill of Rights! We are NOT stupid and we know who is behind this! We will fight them and their 'god' tooth and nail, if need be. The Guard's violation of the Fourth Amendment in the Boston suburbs is disgusting and criminal! This is what the British did to the Colonies! Is this practice for the future? Not all Americans will be so willing to have the government barge into their homes with rifles drawn and no Search Warrant! The center of the country is not like the coasts. You know this. Because I exercise my right to free speech, the government calls me a 'terrorist'. I am an AMERICAN! I have rights that the government CANNOT take away no matter what 'law' Congress wants to squeak by or executive order Obama wants to pen to give himself power that is also unConstitutional. We will not observe them because they are in violation of our Constitution! We are becoming GERMANY - and the USSR! This must STOP! A Constituent, Laurie Giesler UN Sculpture Reveals Intention Dear Congress, Do not believe for a moment that the battle is over! While background checks may help slightly, those who seek to engage in criminal activity do not obtain weapons through legal means. And, if they do not yet have a criminal record but intend to perpetrate a crime, the person obtains the weapon while still considered to be a law abiding citizen. Fact: Communities that have more relaxed gun laws have fewer violent crimes. Where did Adam Lanza get the pistol he used to kill adults and children at Sandy Hook elementary? From his law abiding parents. If a background check was performed, would his record reflect his mental status? Every effort to make it more difficult for criminals to obtain guns didn't stop Dylan Quick, who has no psychiatric record, from stabbing 14 people at Lone Star Community College last week. "... a sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand." (Seneca 'the younger'). Law abiding Americans do not wish to use weapons against their fellow citizens - criminals do. When Congress learns how to remove guns and other weapons from the criminals' hands alone, it will have done a noble deed. Any other legislation is corrupt at its core and empowers the government over the citizens it serves and is contrary to the ideals for which our nation is supposed to stand. Remember what Benjamin Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." We will never be 'safe'. It is only an illusion. The government is using this illusion to empower itself over the citizens and it must cease, immediately! "Government is not reason, it is not eloquent, it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the people's liberty's teeth." George Washington A Constituent You Serve and For Whom You Took an Oath to Uphold the Constitution ... A Slate magazine article by Libby Copeland in January, 2012, reported that, according to a ‘new study’, polygamy was not good for society. This despite the promotion of polygamy by The Learning Channel’s show, Sister Wives. Ms. Copeland notes that ‘…some feminists, lefties, and libertarians have wondered aloud whether plural marriage is really so bad. History suggests that it is.’
Ms. Copeland doesn’t name names of those who ‘wonder’ if polygamy is ‘so bad’; however, she does state that, according to a University of British Columbia study, societies have moved away from polygamy because of the social problems it causes. Further, the university’s cultural anthropologist, Joe Henrich (and colleagues), states, ‘Monogamous marriage reduces crime’, according to the article. On April 15, 2013, Jillian Keenan, wrote an article Slate published stating quite the opposite: ‘While the Supreme Court and the rest of us are all focused on the human right of marriage equality, let’s not forget that the fight doesn’t end with same-sex marriage. We need to legalize polygamy, too. Legalized polygamy in the United States is the constitutional, feminist, and sex-positive choice. More importantly, it would actually help protect, empower, and strengthen women, children, and families.’ [emphases added] Ms. Keenan argues that forced polygamous unions are wrong, but consenting unions are good for society because polygamists are not forced into hiding by society, therefore, any abuses would be reported. She also states that, 'The case for polygamy is, in fact, a feminist one and shows women the respect we deserve.' And, she states that, 'heterosexual marriage is no better or worse than homosexual marriage....' Ms. Keenan uses just one portion of the University of British Columbia's study for her argument. There are several other societal (and moral) factors that argue against polygamy. The study states that polygamous societies create large numbers of unmarried men associated with 'increased rape, theft, murder, and substance abuse'. How is that positive in a feminist's mind?!? To argue that feminism trumps anthropological study of society is ludicrous! To recognize homosexual marriage as a Constitutional right will truly be the slippery slope the nation was warned against. A friend claimed awhile ago that if homosexual marriage was given approval by the nation's courts, pedophilia and beastiality wouldn't be far behind. She was correct! Paraphilia: 'a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities'. By this definition, all of the above sexual anomalies are psychological and not biological and all are dangerous to the body. Human beings were not fashioned in any way, shape or form for anything but heterosexuality! And, human beings were fashioned psychologically for union between one man and one woman (think about the jealousy which permeates polygamy)! While homosexuals attempt to have their inability to procreate labeled as 'infertility' rather than the fact that it is biologically impossible, peddlers of every disgusting practice, harmful to women, children, and animals is bellying up to the bar to have their abominable carnal desires re-designated as a Constitutional right. Has the nation totally lost its cumulative mind - or has it been overtaken by evil deception? Who's an 'extremist'? According to the military's training Powerpoint: [This list is given in the exact order and with exact spelling and notations.]
Of the 18 groups listed, 6/7 are 'Christian', 3 are Jewish, and 6 are Islam/Muslim. Notice the top three. Monday's Bombs Yesterday, Peter Bergen, CNN's national security analyst, suggested twice that "right-wing extremists" could be behind the Boston Marathon bombings. This, despite the fact that more than an hour later, CNN reported that Boston Police still did not have a suspect in custody. Talk about trying to propagandize the public! Bergen likened the perpetrator(s) to a 'group' in Oregon (2010). Mr. Bergen: You, sir, are a propaganda-monger and have the brains of a dip-stick! Update: Why were the people told to be calm before the bomb went off? See the second video below. The first family mixes business with pleasure - family vacations that include the President's speaking engagements (campaign) about gun control, global warming, the sequester, budget issues (POTUS has never submitted a budget as required until forced by Congress this year - a bit late), etc.
Plenty of businessman and woman elect to follow business trips with family vacations - but, the office of the President is not a business! It's not the President's money! March, 2012, marked the first lady's 16th trip (to Aspen) since entering the White House. There have been very expensive trips:
That's just three years' worth! Malia and Sasha were listed as 'senior staff' on the flight manifest for the South African trip. The 'official' purpose of the trip was to encourage young people to become involved in national affairs, but Michelle and her entourage also visited several tourist venues, historical landmarks and museums, Nelson Mandela, and enjoyed a private safari at a South African game reserve. In August, 2011, it was reported in the Daily Mail (England) that 'White House sources today claimed that the First Lady has spent $10million of U.S. taxpayers' money on vacations alone in the past year. Branding her 'disgusting' and 'a vacation junkie', they say the 47-year-old mother-of-two has been indulging in five-star hotels, where she splashes out on expensive massages and alcohol.' Although some of Obama's predecessors took more vacation days, most previous Presidents spent time at their family homes, not galavanting across the nation and globe. And, their families didn't take additional vacations at taxpayer expense. Looks like the office of the President is becoming quite a boondoggle. Reported unemployment was 8.1% in February, 2013, and 7.6% in March. However, this rate does not include those who can no longer collect benefits, either because they have stopped looking for work or exhausted available benefits (up to 46 weeks). Actual unemployment is as much as 25.5%. Don't you think this is getting disgusting? |
Please Post a Comment or Contact Us BelowArchives
May 2018
Categories
All
|
Proudly powered by Weebly